logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.06 2017고합93
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

After acquiring a company with almost no actual sales with C, D, E, F, etc., the Defendant conspired to obtain a nominal loan, such as corporate card, corporate operating funds, trading funds, etc. by submitting false financial statements prepared in the size of sales to financial institutions according to 10 billion won.

Accordingly, C decided to take over G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) with almost no actual sales around November 2014 to KRW 18 million or KRW 20 million, and the Defendant contacted C with D’s introduction, and the Defendant did not actually operate G, even though C did not engage in any activity, C was the most significant company, and was to obtain a 150,000,000 won and a spack passenger car as the representative of G, in return for performing as if it was the representative of G.

Around that time, F prepared a financial statement under the name of tax accountant H, each of which was processed as KRW 32,300,000 in G, while G’s sales in 2011 were KRW 5.766 billion, KRW 440,000 in 2012, KRW 9.20,000,000 in 201, KRW 9.657 billion in 2013, while the sales in 2013 were KRW 7.466,00,000 in 2014, KRW 10.99 billion in 2014, and provided it to the Defendant, etc.

1. In accordance with the contents of the above public offering and C’s instructions, the Defendant filed an application for issuance of a corporate card with the victim bank, Hana Bank, Nonghyup Bank, Enterprise Bank, and New Bank, at a place where it is impossible to know the Seoul or less location between the first patrolman and the first patrolman from January 2015, and the Defendant was issued a corporate card with the said bank believed to be a sound company G by creating the false financial statements of G and requiring the said corporation to submit it as evidence for credit assessment at the time of application for the issuance of the said corporate card.

After December 15, 2014, from around May 8, 2015, D, C, and E used each of the above corporate cards and then used the victim corporate bank's corporate card 99,98,366 won, Han Bank corporate card 8,270,650 won, Han Bank corporate card 10,345,206 won, and the Agricultural Bank corporate card.

arrow