The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable that the court below’s sentence (for six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, two years of probation, observation of protection, community service, 120 hours of sexual assault treatment, and 40 hours of sexual assault treatment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the defendant led to the crime and had no record of the same crime, the crime of this case was committed during the suspension period of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor due to the commission of an in-service fraud, the defendant did not obtain a letter from the injured party, and did not appear to make efforts to recover the damage. In addition, taking into account the circumstances leading to the crime, the attitude of the criminal act, the age of the defendant, sexual conduct, and the circumstances of various sentencing as shown in the record, such as equity in the case where the judgment is rendered simultaneously with the case where the judgment becomes final and conclusive, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.