logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 (춘천) 2018.01.31 2017누959
등록취소처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

The court's explanation of this case is the same as the ground for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this case is cited by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[In examining the whole records of this case including evidence submitted by the defendant in the trial, it is difficult to conclude that "where a new company is allowed to enter the existing company, it is impossible to perform the stable and efficient responsible administration as to the disposal of domestic wastes due to excessive competition between the small and medium enterprise and the small enterprise, and even if the business area is restricted and other necessary conditions are attached, it is impossible to solve them." Above all, it does not seem that the defendant made a specific and thorough examination as to the above point in the disposition of this case. Therefore, the decision of the first instance court is unlawful, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow