The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, at around 04:00 on July 31, 2015, was in front of the clothes of “D” located in Sungwon-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, and immediately before that, he did not provide personnel management to the victim E-gu F, an employee of the above main office, at the main office in the vicinity of the Defendant.

On the ground that the victim was able to take the bath theory, the victim's less part of the victim who was coming from the above main point of view was 20 meters by hand, leading about 20 meters of the victim's face, and then the victim's face was sent to the victim by drinking.

As a result, the Defendant was suffering from the 28th anniversary of the need for treatment for the victim.

2. Since the investigation and investigation agency consistently, the Defendant testified to the effect that the Defendant was consistent with the Defendant’s assertion that “The Defendant was able to blickly blickly and flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flick with the Defendant

H In the investigative agency and this court, the statement was made by the Defendant that “the Defendant laid down the victim’s timber less and clothes in the future, her hand in front of the clothes, when her blicked at one time,” and the statement was again made by the testimony to the effect that “The fact was flick because the Defendant was under the influence of drinking while driving the victim, so the Defendant was flicked, and the victim was flicked on the floor because she was flicked with his hand, and flicked on the floor, and was made a false statement at the victim’s request.”