1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 20 million to the Plaintiff; and (b) 5% per annum from January 31, 2013 to November 27, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

According to the purport of Gap evidence No. 1 (the certificate of rent) and the entire pleadings, the defendant can recognize the fact that the defendant borrowed 20 million won from the plaintiff as of January 30, 2013. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the damages for delay calculated at each rate of 15% per annum under the Civil Act until November 27, 2015, which is the date the decision of this case is rendered, from January 31, 2013, the day following the due date for payment of the above loan amount of KRW 20 million, and from January 31, 2013, which is the day following the due date for the contract (the plaintiff reduced the claim amount during the lawsuit) to the extent of the defendant's obligation (the plaintiff has reduced the claim amount during the lawsuit).

As to this, the defendant asserts that the above loan loan certificate was made by the plaintiff's coercion, and thus it is not sufficient to recognize that the above loan certificate was made by the above loan certificate by the mere statement of Nos. 3 and 4 alone, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition.