Among the judgment of the first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid under the order shall be revoked.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a company running the automobile maintenance business, and the Defendant is the owner of the Crain vehicle (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

B. When the instant vehicle was damaged due to a traffic accident around May 2016, the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to repair the said vehicle on June 4, 2016.

C. The Plaintiff completed repair on June 17, 2016, and the instant vehicle was released on the day.

According to the plaintiff's automobile inspection and maintenance statement, the automobile repair cost of this case is 873,214 won.

E. Meanwhile, the Minister of Construction and Transportation announced the standard time table and painting table (including working hours) during the maintenance work based on the results of the study calculated based on the data obtained by measuring the time required for each actual work in the participation of insurance companies and car repair businessmen pursuant to Article 13-2(1) of the former Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (wholly amended by Act No. 9065, Mar. 28, 2008) by the Ministry of Construction and Transportation No. 2005-191, Jun. 17, 2005.

In addition, the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs announced on June 19, 2010 that the Minister: (a) pursuant to Article 16 of the former Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (amended by Act No. 11690, Mar. 23, 2013); (b) pursuant to Article 16 of the former Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (amended by Act No. 11690, Mar. 23, 2013); (c) pursuant to Article 21,53 through 24,252 of the adequate maintenance charges (per hour) for automobile insurance surveys and research to prevent disputes over the maintenance charges between an insurance company

'Public Notice in 2010'

(ii) [The facts without dispute over recognition, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 10, 12 to 14, and 16 to 18 respectively, the gist of the pleading

2. Summary of parties' arguments;

A. As to the maintenance work, such as breaking, printing, painting, etc. conducted by the Plaintiff for the repair of the instant vehicle, the instant case, as shown in the attached Table 1, is deemed to fall under the case of unfolding and exchange work for a time during the standard work hours according to the result of the appraiser D of the first instance trial as shown in the attached Table 1.