(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.08.18 2017고단379

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.08.18 2017고단379

강제추행등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 3, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the victim D (Woo, 68 years of age) located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, Seoul, about 00:20 on December 3, 2016, on the part of the victim D (Woo) and E, on the part of the victim, on the ground that the victim did not drink, and committed an indecent act by force on the part of the victim by using the victim's chests in a way that he did not escape.

around 00:20 on December 7, 2016, the Defendant threatened the victim with his or her abusive behavior case, etc. under the influence of alcohol at the above E main point operated by the victim D (Woo, 68 years of age). While being under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant threatened the victim with his or her abusive behavior case, etc., “the bruth of the death of the bomer, the bruth of the death of the bom.”

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 379"

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. 112 Report statements (a defendant and his defense counsel recognized the fact that assaulted the victim at the time by smugglinging the victim at the time, but asserts to the effect that the victim did not have been her boomed or committed an indecent act against the victim.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., (i) the credibility of the statement made by the witness D, the victim, because it is very specific and consistent in important parts, (ii) the victim was aware that he was assaulted and immediately reported by the victim, (iii) the victim was extremely interested, and (iv) the Defendant and the victim were deadly dead prior to each of the crimes in this case.

Even if the victim made a false statement about each of the crimes of this case in order to harm the defendant on such ground.

Considering the fact that it is difficult to see, the above argument between the defendant and his defense counsel is without merit).

유사 판례

-울산지방법원 2017.07.12 2016고단2844 (1)

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.05.30 2017고단2788

-창원지방법원 2016.07.01 2015고단2784

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.04.13 2016고단9445

-춘천지방법원 속초지원 2017.09.13 2017고단64