logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2019.01.25 2018가단6936
부당이득금
Text

1. The defendant,

A. The Plaintiff A’s KRW 76,454,603 as well as 5% per annum from February 20, 2018 to August 6, 2018.

Reasons

1. Facts without dispute;

A. Plaintiff A and Plaintiff B, his father’s father’s father’s father, share of the “ownership share” in each of the lands listed below (hereinafter “instant land” according to the sequence, and in the case of common name, each of the instant land”).

During the period of 272/100 of A. 84, 9 B/84, the ownership shares of the co-owners of the land, the ownership of which are owned by the owner of the land, during the period of 93/27/100 of B/84, 9 B/84 square meters A/84 of the 684 square meters A/84 square meters of the 684 square meters of the Gu, E, during the period of 94/27/100 of the 94 square meters of the 595 square meters A/84 square meters of the Gu, G during the period of 94/100 of the 257

B. Of the land of this case No. 1, the defendant: attached Table 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 87, 86, 74, 75, 83, 76, 76, 80, 81, 82, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 20, and 1 in sequence connected each point of the land of this case to the defendant; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 5, 6, 87, 86, 74, 75, 75, 83, 82, 82, 82, 52, 51, 52, 51, 52, 63, 31, 283, 29, 29, 29, 10, and 34.

Plaintiff

In the past, unjust enrichment (as of February 20, 208; - February 19, 2018) in the future unjust enrichment (as of February 20, 2018 - The date of the loss of possession by the defendant) in the part of land No. 2, 34,135 won in the part of land No. 4, A76,454,603 won in the month of 288,128 won in the month of 39,516 won in the part of land No. 34,135 won in the month of 148,982 won in B8, B80,687,442 won in the month of 357,278 won in the month of 39,516 won in the month of 39,516 won in the month of 34,135 won in the month

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the defendant is obligated to pay each of the money as stated in the disposition to the plaintiffs, as unjust enrichment equivalent to the past and future rent as to the part of the defendant's possession of each of the land

3. If so, the plaintiffs' objection.

arrow