The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal (two years of suspended sentence in six months of imprisonment) of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The Defendant’s breach of duty of care is a condition for sentencing unfavorable to the Defendant, for instance, that the Defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim, due to an injury requiring 12 weeks medical treatment, and that the Defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim until the trial.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime as the age of 74 years; (b) the Defendant’s payment of insurance money to the victim for medical expenses, etc. through a motor vehicle comprehensive insurance in which the Defendant was admitted; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, family relationship, etc., the Defendant’s punishment is too un

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.