Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for five months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants, E, and F respectively are the Chinese nationals’ Republic of China’s nationality (hereinafter referred to as “China”). Defendant A entered the Republic of Korea on or around March 10, 2009 with a visa for study (D-2) and is attending the ASEAN Campus visual design department at G University. Defendant B entered the Republic of Korea on or around March 10, 2009 with a visa for study (D-2) and is attending the said ASEAN Campus E-electronic display engineering department; E entered the Republic of Korea on or around March 18, 2009 for a visa for study (D-2) and is a person attending the said ASEAN campus mobile engineering system; and F enter the Republic of Korea for a visa on or around March 10, 2009 and is a person attending the tax accounting department at G University Campus at G University.

Defendant

A, in order to be qualified as necessary to graduate from a university, requested the applicant to apply for the middle class of the Korean Language Ability Test (TOPOK) conducted by the National International Education Center under the control of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology of the Republic of Korea, requested another applicant to apply for the second class of the Korean Language Ability Test conducted by the National International Education Center under the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology of the Republic of Korea, asked the applicant to apply for the second class of the Korean Language Ability Test conducted by the Committee on International Exchange at the International Exchange Promotion Foundation of the Foundation, and the applicant for the second class to apply for the second class on the date of each examination

Accordingly, Defendant A requested that he applied for the Korean language ability test to the E-gu F on April 2012, and the F consented thereto, and the F sent his photograph file to Defendant B, which was in China, by e-mail, around May 7, 2012, according to Defendant A’s instruction.

On April 2012, Defendant A continuously requested Ma to apply for a soil-related test instead of a soil-related test, and Party A consented, and Party B sent his/her photograph file to Defendant B by e-mail according to Defendant A’s instruction after Defendant A consented thereto.

On the other hand, Defendant A has been aware of the identity of Defendant B around that time.