beta
Text
The defendant shall publicly announce the summary of the judgment against the defendant not guilty.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who operated E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) from around 2001.
On April 2013, the Defendant: (a) registered the company’s debt to the bank, the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund, etc. in an amount equivalent to KRW 1.6 billion; and (b) registered the company’s debt in an amount equivalent to KRW 400 million in personal loan; and (c) KRW 2.1 billion in credit amount to KRW 100 million in credit amount; and (d) therefore, (e) has to invest in facilities investment every year; (b) therefore, (c) has to invest in facilities investment amounting to KRW 250 million in the amount of equipment funds equivalent to KRW 250 million; and (d) has been under the so-called so-called “proh”, such as the issuance of a financing bill to prevent a bill back to the maturity and the payment of a bill back to the discount of the bill, even if the Defendant received a discount from the victim G through F, there was no intent or
Nevertheless, on April 22, 2013, the Defendant appears to have the same attitude as F to settle the amount of the bill normally on the date of payment, and on September 9, 2013, the date of issuance, the date of September 25, 2013, stated “the date of August 26, 2013,” but it is apparent that it is a clerical error (Article 462 of the Investigation Records). However, it is apparent that the Defendant is a clerical error (Article 462 of the Investigation Records, the face value of KRW 87,00,00 and KRW 93,00,000,00 and deceiving F by requesting a discount of the bill, and that the bill will be settled normally through F, and that it would be settled normally from the victim’s receipt of KRW 156,06,00,000 from that date to August 9, 2013.”
(No. 347, 348, No. 900) received total of KRW 824,471,820 in the same manner as the bill discount as shown in the attached Form No. 1 in the same manner.
Although the Defendant continued to pay the bills issued as above, the amount of bills has been properly paid in excess of the obligation.