logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2016.10.21 2016나11439
총회결의무효확인 등
Text

1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the dismissal of Paragraph 3 among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. Judgment on the main defense of this case

A. The part related to the instant case in relation to the AB Tax Report (No. 22-1) of 24 years of age 25 years of age 25 years of age 26 years of age 27 years of age k AC AE AE AE AE AE AG AH AH AP 1) 1876 GaB 1876 is as follows. The part related to the instant case in relation to the 24 years of age 25 years of age 25 years of age 26 years of age 27 years of age 26 years of age 27 years of age k AM AM AM 2) AB Tax Report (No. 6), is as follows:

The following parts are applicable to the case in relation to the case in the AB Large AB 25 years of age and 26 years of age and 27 years of age and 29 years of age and K L AP AP AS AS AT M N (living AU), Plaintiff AV AV AV AF (Shipment), AV AV AV AV AF (Shipment) AM AM AM AP PP 3) AB M (OT 3) in 1955 (No. 7). The part related to the case in this case is as follows: 24 years of age and 25 years of age and 27 years of age and 27 years of age and 29 years of age and 29 years of age and older, and the part related to the case in the case in the case in the 24 years of age and 27 years of age and 29 years of age and KaPN AM AM AM AE AM AE AM AM AM AE (IM) 200 AM AM AM AEM AE (Plaintiff).).

5) There are two copies of the O. The first copy (Evidence A No. 8-1) was re-restricted to the removal from the military register on June 25, 1954. The second copy (Evidence B No. 10 was re-restricted on December 30, 1964, and the second copy was re-restricted on December 30, 1964, and was cancelled on April 15, 1967.

The parts relating to this case among the copies of each of the above proposals are as follows:

① The first certified copy is indicated in the column of “N” and “the relationship with the former head of Hoju” as “N”, but is indicated in the column of general registered matters of theO as “the family inheritance due to the death of Jeonju M.”

② The second certified copy shall be "N", "O", in the column of "N".

arrow