1. Defendant B’s KRW 28,592,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from July 3, 2015 to July 18, 2018.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 8, 2015, Defendant B entered into a contract with the Plaintiff, stating that “The Plaintiff shall pay Defendant B tuition fees of KRW 80 million and advance payment of KRW 60 million, and the remainder of KRW 20 million shall be paid KRW 40 million by calculating two times as a result of performance, and Defendant B shall provide the Plaintiff’s children E with a lodging school and provide a teaching by specialized instructors for each subject, and the teaching period shall be approximately 400 hours from February 8, 2015 to November 12, 2015.”

B. Pursuant to the instant contract, the Plaintiff (i.e., KRW 6 million as the down payment on the same day, (ii) KRW 2.5 million as the book value, and (iii) KRW 2.5 million as the down payment, and (iv) around March 4, 2015, as the head of the Defendant C’s corporate bank bank account, a parent of Defendant B, and (iv) KRW 54 million as the remainder of the tuition fees

6.23.Around 23.2 billion won was deposited in the E’s living cost, respectively.

C. On February 8, 2015, immediately after the instant contract, Defendant B moved into and managed E in the Gangnam-gu Seoul F Apartment which is one’s own residence, Gangnam-gu Seoul, and went beyond the three-time course of study by Korea University political diplomatic and doctoral degree, and went beyond the Korean language directly, and the following year.

5. At around 6.M., Gangnam-gu Seoul, H C. 1818, and one of the studio-type officetels was leased and resided together after moving the studio-type officetel, and the class was conducted in a form similar to the above.

After that, E shall, upon hearing opinions on physical facilities, such as Defendant B and C, the same year.

7.3.Around 7.2, Defendant B’s officetel and returned home.

【Ground of recognition】 Each entry of evidence Nos. 1 through 12 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. On January 20, 2015, Defendant B’s main argument and the main point of his argument are as follows: (a) Defendant B provides the Plaintiff with an accommodation teaching school to the Plaintiff E; and (b) Defendant B is a professional instructor for each subject.