The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On May 2008, the Defendant agreed to carry out joint development projects with E as well as 6 lots of land, including “D, Gyeong-si,” and agreed to receive KRW 280 million from E as investment money, but upon cancelling the joint development project agreement on December 23, 2008, the Defendant owed the obligation to return investment money to E. As such, E urged the Defendant to return the investment money. As upon the Defendant’s demand to return the investment money, E sold 11 parcel of land, such as “H-owned forest and field,” which is owned by the Defendant’s wife, to E, sold the land exchange agreement on H-owned forest and field located in the middle of each of the above forests.

The Defendant: (a) did not agree with H on land exchange with regard to “I forest in Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si,” the ownership of H, and “G forest in Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si,” the Defendant’s wife F; (b) agreed from May 2008 to December 22, 2008, to exchange “H I forest in Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si,” and on May 22, 2008.

“After indicating the purport, H had affixed a seal arbitrarily h’s name and attached to H’s name. Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the land exchange agreement in the name of H, a private document related to rights and obligations. B) On December 13, 2010 (the written indictment is stated as “2012.” but it appears to be a clerical error in the indictment, but it appears to be a clerical error in the indictment). On December 13, 2010, the Defendant agreed to determine 11 parcels, including the Defendant’s wife F of the Defendant’s wife, and sell it to E, as if it was a document duly formed, as stipulated in paragraph (1). C. The Defendant concluded that he/she had completed the forged land exchange agreement with the Defendant as stated in paragraph (1). The Defendant appears to have written the written indictment on December 2010 (hereinafter “2012.”). On December 13, 2012, the Defendant appears to be a clerical error in writing with respect to the Defendant’s forest and forest land owned by the Defendant.