logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.07.26 2018고단500 (1)
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 23, 2016, at around 16:20, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft in the amount equivalent to KRW 2,060,00,000, of the market price of the victim E placed in front of D on the front road located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (GR125, test color) by towing it; and (b) committed a theft on seven occasions in total from July 1, 2014 to November 2016, 200, as indicated in the daily list of crimes in the attached Table of crimes.

2. On October 2016, the Defendant illegally used air hivers of the Dongsan Village Park, which is located in the Dongsandong-dong Seoul, in order to remove a number plate (F) which was removed from and kept in the custody of the fish from the Sindong-dong, Seoul, as shown in the table of crime No. 3, from the Sinsan-dong Community Park, as shown in the table of crime No. 5 of the annexed crime, as shown in the table of crime No. 5 of the annexed crime, removed the number plate (G) of 110 Oroba, and affixed the above hivers 110 Oraba.

Accordingly, the Defendant used the number plate, a air defense, unlawfully for the purpose of exercising the right.

3. The Defendant had operated a two-wheeled automobile with a registration number plate attached to the two-wheeled automobile, which was illegally used from July 2017 to February 5, 2018, as prescribed in paragraph 2, on the first road located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised the off-to-land number plate, which is the air strawing that was illegally used.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of victims of E, J, K, and L;

1. A report on theft of M vehicle;

1. Sources for verifying the theft, and sources for confirming the termination of theft;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of unlawful use of official marks) and Article 238 (2) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of unlawful use of air) and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. In light of all the circumstances, such as the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes, the amount of damage caused by the sentencing is not considerable, and the victims’ damage has not been recovered properly, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.

arrow