The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case was cut off by the Defendant on the ground that at around June 16, 2015, the victim D (23 years of age) and E (23 years of age) were cut off in front of the C convenience store, and that he did not have to do so.

The Defendant, while intending to sprinke the victims with no spons, snow sprinks, etc., assaulted the victim’s right face at one time with the hand floor, and sprinking the front part of the hemoth that was used.

The Defendant continuously assaulted the victim E, such as brushing strts, in which the victim E suffered.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. The victims expressed their respective intent not to be punished against the Defendant on July 13, 2015, which was after the instant prosecution was instituted. Thus, the instant prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.