1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim is all dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties.

The fact that the Defendant is the owner of the construction of the fourth-story detached house (hereinafter referred to as “instant house”) on the N in Gunsan-si N, the Defendant started the construction of the instant house on February 3, 2014, which was approved for use on May 31, 2016, and the fact that the registration of ownership preservation was made on June 2, 2016 under the Defendant’s name is recognized by the respective descriptions in subparagraphs 1 and 2 and the purport of the entire pleadings.

Plaintiff

In the instant case, the designated parties filed a lawsuit against the Defendant for the payment of the respective amount stated in the claim, which is the difference, by asserting that only the construction cost stated in the lower table was paid out of the total construction cost, and that only the construction cost was paid out of the total construction cost.

The defendant asserts that the construction work of the name of the Corporation was 18,480,00 won for C- 18,480,000 won for C- 21,480,000 won for C- 23,000,000 won for T- 21,204,000 won for T- 17,000,000 won for G- 17,500,000 won for G- 15,500,500,000 won for 0,000 won for H- 21,50,500,000 won for construction work, 00 won for H- 18,50,000 won for 0,000 won for G- 15,50,000 won for construction work, 00 won for 00,000 won for G- 18,500,000 won for G- 10,000 won for construction work

According to the whole purport of Gap evidence Nos. 3-1 through 12, and Gap evidence Nos. 4, the defendant himself/herself has part of the construction cost stated in the above table to the plaintiff and the selected parties.