logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.01.24 2016가단8294
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim is all dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties.

Reasons

The fact that the Defendant is the owner of the construction of the fourth-story detached house (hereinafter referred to as “instant house”) on the N in Gunsan-si N, the Defendant started the construction of the instant house on February 3, 2014, which was approved for use on May 31, 2016, and the fact that the registration of ownership preservation was made on June 2, 2016 under the Defendant’s name is recognized by the respective descriptions in subparagraphs 1 and 2 and the purport of the entire pleadings.

Plaintiff

In the instant case, the designated parties filed a lawsuit against the Defendant for the payment of the respective amount stated in the claim, which is the difference, by asserting that only the construction cost stated in the lower table was paid out of the total construction cost, and that only the construction cost was paid out of the total construction cost.

The defendant asserts that the construction work of the name of the Corporation was 18,480,00 won for C- 18,480,000 won for C- 21,480,000 won for C- 23,000,000 won for T- 21,204,000 won for T- 17,000,000 won for G- 17,500,000 won for G- 15,500,500,000 won for 0,000 won for H- 21,50,500,000 won for construction work, 00 won for H- 18,50,000 won for 0,000 won for G- 15,50,000 won for construction work, 00 won for 00,000 won for G- 18,500,000 won for G- 10,000 won for construction work

According to the whole purport of Gap evidence Nos. 3-1 through 12, and Gap evidence Nos. 4, the defendant himself/herself has part of the construction cost stated in the above table to the plaintiff and the selected parties.

arrow