All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court’s sentence of Defendant A (limited to four years of imprisonment, surcharge 73,365,00 won; order to complete a program; 80 hours of imprisonment; and order to disclose and notify information for five years) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence of Defendant B (10 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. It is recognized that Defendant A committed rape against victims during the instant crime, including the fact that Defendant A recognized the rest of the crime from the police investigation and reflects his mistake, and that Defendant A had no past history of criminal punishment.

However, for about four months, Defendant A acquired 70,365,00 won in total as the price of sexual traffic by arranging two sexual traffics for more than 265 times in total, and by misrepresenting himself/herself to investigation agencies and threatening two victims to commit sexual traffics over three occasions, and forced one of them to engage in sexual traffics over 12 times in total for five days, and acquired 3 million won in total as the price of sexual traffics. Defendant A also denied the part of the crime of rape against victims during the crime of this case, and did not appear in the form of advanced death and reflectority. Defendant A continued to have raised mental and physical pain due to excessive sexual traffics, but he/she acquired sexual traffics in full and did not pay some of the price of sexual traffics to the above victims; Defendant A abused the status that he/she is a foreigner of sexual traffic; Defendant A has induced the victims of sexual traffics and forced them to engage in sexual traffics over the age of 12 times in the crime of this case; Defendant A also committed the crimes of this case, Defendant A's age and the sentencing guidelines of this case 2.