beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2019 Highest 106"
1. From 03:00 on December 2, 2018 to 05:40 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) confirmed that the victim B was divingd at the victim’s second-story male water surface room located in Seosan-si, Seosan-si; (b) used one mobile phone unit in the amount of KRW 1 million at the market price owned by the victim; and (c) stolen the victim B.
2. At around December 23:30, 2018, the Defendant thief against the victim E: (a) set aside the victim E from a public bath located in the Seosan City F, Seosan-si; (b) took one safe of the market price equivalent to KRW 50,000,000 in cash owned by the victim; and (c) stolen the victim E.
3. On December 19, 2018, the Defendant: (a) confirmed that the victim H was locked in Jinari or the first floor laup room located in Seocho-si I on December 19, 2018; and (b) subsequently stolen Samsung Gallon, which is equivalent to KRW 1100,000,000, the market value of the victim’s ownership, citing one mobile phone at Samsung Ggal ju City.
4. From around 03:00 on December 27, 2018, the Defendant: (a) confirmed that the victim K was locked in the victim’s second-class male water surface room at Seosan City, Seosan City, a 07:30 slope from around 03:0 on the same day; and (b) used one of Samsung Tallon jugalian 8 mobile phones and one of Samsung Tallon ju (S8 mobile phones) at each of the market prices owned by the victims, thereby thefting.
The defendant of the 2019 Highest 706 " tried to acquire money from victims through Internet goods fraud in order to raise living expenses, etc.
On December 31, 2018, the Defendant sent a false statement to the victim M who reported the sales text to sell KRW 220,000 to the Internet “L” site by accessing the Internet “L” site using a mobile phone at an insular place, and posted a false statement to the effect that deposit KRW 220,000 is made.
However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to sell the mobile phone as promised to the victim.
Nevertheless, the defendant is the victim.