The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact-finding the Defendant was unilaterally assaulted by the victim B, and did not have any assaulted by the victim.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (the fine of KRW 500,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 관한 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거에 의하여 인정되는 다음의 사정, 즉 피해자는 수사기관 및 원심 법정에서, 이 사건 당시 피고인이 손으로 피해자의 멱살을 잡고 턱을 때리고, 발로 피해자의 옆구리 등을 찼다는 취지로 진술하였는바, 폭행 경위에 관한 진술이 구체적이고 일관적인 점에 비추어 피해자의 진술에 신빙성이 있는 점, 이 사건 현장에 있었던 E도 수사기관 및 원심 법정에서, 피고인과 피해자가 서로 멱살을 잡고 밀고 당기면서 몸싸움을 했다는 취지로 진술한 점 등을 종합하여 보면, 피고인이 공소사실 기재와 같이 피해자를 폭행한 사실을 인정할 수 있고, 원심판결에 사실오인의 잘못이 없다.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

B. The circumstances are favorable to the Defendant, such as the following: (a) there are circumstances to consider the circumstances leading up to the instant crime; (b) the Defendant was assaulted by the victim; and (c) the Defendant’s economic situation is not good for a basic livelihood recipient; and (d) there is no same criminal power.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the degree of the type of force used by the Defendant is not less light; (b) the victim is not agreed with; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (d) other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (c) the circumstances after the crime,

Therefore, it is true.