logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.10.21 2016나2006253
부당이득금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part against the Plaintiffs, which orders additional payment, shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Grounds for the court’s explanation concerning this case shall be from the 10th end of the judgment of the first instance to the 16th end of the judgment of the first instance; and

(c) Calculation of costs of installing basic living facilities, 4-2;

D. In addition to the cost of installing basic living facilities per 1 square meter of the instant site and the cost of calculating unjust enrichment, the part concerning the Plaintiffs of the judgment of the first instance court is identical to that of the Plaintiffs, and thus, this shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. A new part of the judgment of the first instance; and

C. 1) In full view of the purport of arguments as indicated in Gap evidence 7 and Eul evidence 6, the total project cost related to the creation of the housing site in the development zone of this case is 501,529,133,251 as indicated below, the total project cost related to the creation of the housing site in this case includes 37,069,532,151, WW development cost is 31,002,065,057, total project cost is 484,619 square meters, total project cost is 261,619 square meters, 223,373.5 square meters, 207, 208, 370, 378, 486, 47, 4816, 486, 47, 1967, 486, 197, 367, 486, 197, 486, 1964, 167

arrow