All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that each punishment (one year of imprisonment, and confiscation) imposed by the court below on the Defendants is too unreasonable.

2. Although the Defendants led to the confession of each of the instant crimes, and there is a favorable condition that reflects the Defendants’ mistake. However, on August 31, 2011, the Defendants were sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for special larceny with respect to the criminal facts committed by the Defendants by intrusion upon an abandoned house by the Defendants in the Changwon District Court's Jinju Branch, which became final and conclusive on September 8, 2011, and the judgment is again committed on September 8, 2011, and the risk of repeating the instant crime is likely to increase because the Defendants committed the instant crime again during the suspended sentence period. Considering the overall sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, comprehensively taking into account the following factors, such as the Defendants' age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the commission of the instant crime, the sentence imposed by the lower court cannot be deemed unfair, and the Defendants' assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, each appeal by the Defendants is without merit, and all appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.