1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 2,00,000 for Plaintiff A, KRW 4,659,016 for Plaintiff B, and KRW 1,50,00 for Plaintiff C.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant E is a person who operates “G” restaurant (hereinafter “instant restaurant”) in Busan Shipping Daegu F, and Defendant D is an employee of the instant restaurant, and Defendant Han Korean Commercial Damage Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant insurance company”) entered into a business liability insurance contract with Defendant E.

B. On September 27, 2014, around 20:0, Plaintiff B and C provided meals with Plaintiff A (Hs and 26 months at the time), who is a child. Defendant D set up a just string with a string, which was hot in the front of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff A set up a juk with a juk kne, which was under his jus and knes of Plaintiff A. Accordingly, Plaintiff A suffered pictures on kne, etc.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

Plaintiff

B required 812,880 won for the treatment of the plaintiff A's image at a shipping-type white hospital, etc., and it is anticipated that it will be 3,700,000 won for future treatment costs such as anti-presidentials.

[Ground of recognition] The absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9 (including the serial number), the inquiry of the fact about Busan Busan Hospital, the result of this court's order to submit each document to the shipping white hospital of this court, the Han River-In-depth Hospital, the result of the appraiser I's appraisal, and the purport of the whole argument

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiffs asserted as follows and seek compensation against the Defendants, such as the entries in the purport of the claim.

(1) Defendant D did not fulfill its duty of care to prevent accidents, such as putting the Plaintiff in front of the Plaintiff, which is a fluent child with heavy fluences, and caused the instant accident.

(2) Accordingly, Defendant D is a tort directly committed by Defendant D, Defendant E is a user of Defendant D, and Defendant E is an insurance company that has concluded a business liability insurance with Defendant E, and is jointly liable for damages.

(3) Taking into account the Plaintiff A’s 20% fault ratio, the following is the same.