1.For the plaintiff:

(a) Category B: the real estate listed in Appendix 2 No. 2 in the order of the real estate list;

(b) the defendantC;

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”), the Plaintiff is a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project association aimed at housing redevelopment and rearrangement project with a size of 116,66.10 square meters, which is located in Ansan-si as a project implementation district, and the Defendants occupy the said real estate as the tenants of each real estate listed in the attached list located in the said project implementation district.

B. On January 15, 2016, the Plaintiff obtained authorization for the change of the project implementation from the Ansan market, and the Ansan market announced the change of the project implementation on the same day. On February 27, 2017, the Plaintiff obtained the approval for the management and disposal plan from the Ansan market, and the Gyeyang market announced the management and disposal plan on the same day.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 11 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The main text of Article 49(6) of the Urban Improvement Act provides, “When the authorization of a management and disposition plan is publicly announced, a right holder, such as the owner, superficies, leasee, etc. of the previous land or building, shall not use or profit from the previous land or building until the date of the public announcement of transfer under Article 86.” Thus, when the public announcement of a management and disposition plan is made, the use or profit of the right holder, such as the owner, superficies, leasee, etc. of the previous land or building, shall be suspended, and the project implementer may use or benefit from the former land or building (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da53635, May 27, 2010). Therefore, the Defendants whose use or profit has been suspended pursuant to the public announcement of the authorization of the management

B. The Defendants asserted that the Plaintiff is obligated to pay the business loss compensation.