logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.11.03 2016고단1593
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C low-speed car.

At around 13:10 on April 28, 2016, the Defendant proceeded along the three-lane (including narrow roads) along the 3-lane direction in the direction of hot intersection in the direction of hot intersection.

Since the location is narrow and the defendant has changed the lane into the two lanes, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to operate the direction, etc. in advance to give notice of change of course and to change the lanes in the front and rear left, while properly examining the traffic situation of the front and rear left.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and changed the direction to the left-hand lane without turning on the direction, and caused the direction to change the direction to the one-lane of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle rapidly to the one-lane in the same direction by driving the vehicle from the two-lanes of the same direction, and led the Defendant to change the direction to the one-lane in the damages of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle, and led the Defendant to shock the front side of the FF driver’s vehicle, which is under way, into the front side of the said E driver’s vehicle, into the front side of the said vehicle’s left-hand part of the vehicle. Accordingly, the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle received the front side of the left-hand part of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the Dong G (V, 65 years of age) of the above-mentioned damaged vehicle G (A) for about 12 weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, damaged the damaged vehicle to have an amount equivalent to KRW 12,472,150 of the repairing cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of the occurrence status of the F and E traffic accidents;

1. Statement on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Entry and video of the traffic accident report;

1. Each description in the medical certificate (G) and written estimate (section 34 of the investigation record) and written estimate (section 35 of the investigation record);

1. Application of statutes on images of field photographs;

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act and Article 268 of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow