The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error and the misapprehension of the legal principle) is that E merely prevented the Defendant from inflicting an injury on the Defendant by assaulting E as stated in the facts charged in this case, and the Defendant’s act constitutes a legitimate act, but the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, the victim made a statement to the effect that the victim suffered bodily harm by assault from the defendant, such as cutting fats, etc. at least three times from the investigative agency to the trial, and the defendant made a witness F's statement (45 pages of the trial record) that the victim had fatdddddd and pusheded with fats, and the defendant was dispatched to the police officer at the time of fighting and received a report from the victim and heard the fighting situation, the defendant was fatd on the part of the victim with her hand, and he again fatdddddddd with the victim's bats during the process of fighting from the victim, and the victim was arrested as the victim's fatd, G, and H's statement (the victim's 6,74, 100, 210, 10, 210, 10, 200).