A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

The application for compensation of this case is dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant and the Victim B, “2018 Highly 1052,” are as follows: (a) the Defendant and the Victim B, in early October 2017, have been accumulated with Driju-gun located in Pyeongtaek-gun, and they have been accumulated with friendship.

1. On October 2017, the Defendant defraudeded the mobile phone fraud: (a) the victim made a false statement to the effect that “I want to lend money to the Defendant in which I want to keep the money in which I want to do so; (b) I want to sell the mobile phone in the face of I would sell money to I going through the mobile phone under four names; (c) the mobile phone fee will be paid on behalf of I would be paid and the instrument price will be repaid after I would pay.”

However, even if the victim transferred a new mobile phone device, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay the mobile phone charges or the cost of equipment instead of the victim because the defendant instructed another obligation at the time.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around 19:00 on October 17, 2017, had the victim open 1,152,800 opon71 (I) from H stores located in Gangseo-si F on the part of Gangseo-si on the part of October 17, 2017, and transferred the opon 71 (I) from the opon. At around 17:00 on October 18, 2017, the Defendant had the victim open 1,258,92 opon 72 (L, M) from the K stores located in Gangseo-si Si, Gangnam-si, and received the opon 1,254,000 opon 1,250 opon 81 (O) from the H stores located in Gangseo-si, Gangnam-si on October 19, 2017.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained four mobile phones of 4,722,420 won.

2. On October 21, 2017, the defrauded defraudeded the borrowed money with the following false statement to the effect that “The Defendant borrowed KRW 2 million, instead of civil engineering and Q, from Puniversity, the Defendant borrowed money from E in lieu of civil engineering and Q, and then changed the money to B. The Defendant would have repaid the money by November 14, 2017.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the money that the victim borrowed from Q, because the defendant is responsible for other debts at the time.

Nevertheless, .