The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a driver of CMobing passenger car, and the victim D(70) is a driver of the Eststun passenger car.

At around 11:30 on May 1, 2015, the Defendant tried to change the vehicle line from the third to the second line of the above road in order to change the vehicle line from the third to the second line on the ground that the victim did not yield any concession, and then the victim tried to change the vehicle line from the second line to the first line, the Defendant also changed the vehicle line to the second line, and the defect in order for the victim to change the vehicle line to the second line, the Defendant also changed to the second line, and the defect in order for the victim to change to the second line to the second line, the Defendant also threatened the victim with the change of the vehicle line to the first line, and the defect in order for the victim to change to the second line to the second one.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are those falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the express will of the victim under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, the victim prepared a written agreement that the defendant shall not be punished for the defendant after the prosecution of this case, and since the above written agreement was submitted to this court, the prosecution shall be dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.