All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. As to Defendant B’s ground of appeal Nos. 1 and Defendant F’s ground of appeal, the lower court determined that, on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, it is difficult to view the Defendants’ act of revocation of permission for use of light trading market as an inevitable invalidation because it is serious

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court’s determination is justifiable, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending

2. As to the ground of appeal No. 2 by Defendant B, the lower court determined that the Plaintiff acquired the right to use each of the above land through the instant building permit of the light name market for which the Republic of Korea, the owner of the instant No. 1 and No. 2, delegated the authority to manage and dispose of

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court’s determination is justifiable, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the relationship between the building permit

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.