The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for up to eight months) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the defendant confessions the crime of this case and reflects the defendant.

B. However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, did not know about the nature of the crime by either obsing or threatening the police officers who properly perform official duties, or by using violence; (b) did not know about the fact that the Defendant committed the act of obstructing the performance of official duties on August 30, 2015; (c) did not agree with the victimized police officers; (d) did not recover from damage; and (e) did not change any special circumstances after the sentence of the lower judgment was issued; and (e) did not change the circumstances; and (e) did not change the circumstances that are conditions for the sentencing specified in the instant argument, including the Defendant’s age, details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, even if the circumstances favorable to the Defendant were considered, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.