A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was the representative director of D Co., Ltd. established for the purpose of development, manufacture, distribution, maintenance and repair of software, and is a person who received fees from the company under the pretext of consulting in relation to the government-invested subsidy business.

The Small and Medium Business Administration (hereinafter referred to as the "Production Environment Innovation Technology Development Project") organized by the Small and Medium Business Administration refers to a project that receives government contributions from the Small and Medium Enterprise Technology Information Promotion Agency (hereinafter referred to as the "the above Promotion Agency") entrusted by the Small and Medium Business Information Promotion Agency (hereinafter referred to as the "Promotion Agency") for the development of equipment, systems, materials, etc. to eliminate poor working environment, labor intensity, dangerous factors, etc. in the production site of small and medium enterprises, and for the enhancement of corporate productivity such as the reduction of defective rate, cost reduction, etc., and for the improvement and the development of new processes. Since the above project requires government contributions of 75% and 25% of the participating enterprises,

On March 2007, the Defendant reported the announcement of the “Projects for Developing Development of Manufacturing Environment Innovation” posted on the homepage of the Small and Medium Business Administration in 2007, and had the Defendant select it as the “institution in charge of the above projects” through E Union (hereinafter “the above Association”) E Union’s Vice-F, which was known to the ordinary business relationship, through the Defendant’s designation of the “institution in charge of the above projects,” and then, by paying all the shares to be borne by the participating enterprises, he paid the expenses incurred in the above projects and unfix the expenses incurred in the above projects, he received the government contributions related

The defendant, around March of the same year, applied to F for the development of the stop period used by the gold company as the main institution in charge of the above business in relation to the above business performed by F in the first half of the year 2007, and the head of G G, a designated stop development company, is required to perform the above business.