Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 15:00 on April 18, 2005, the Defendant discovered female children under 13 years of age in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, B, by force, and by force, committed indecent act, etc. on four occasions from around that time to May 15:43, 2006, the Defendant was detained by force on four occasions, and thereafter, the Daejeon District Court requested to attach an attachment order of a location tracking electronic device for five years at the Yancheon-gu, Daejeon District Court, Daejeon District Court, the attachment order of the location tracking electronic device was decided for five years from the Daejeon District Court’s branch support, and on March 14, 2013, attached the location tracking electronic tracking device at the Yan-gu probation office.

After attaching a location tracking electronic device, the Defendant is well aware that he/she is punished if he/she arbitrarily separates or damages a location tracking electronic device from his/her body, interferes with propagation, alters data received, or otherwise harms the utility by any other means, regardless of intention or negligence;

1. On April 21, 2013, around 08:42, 2013, around 08:42, the Defendant left a position tracking device that the Defendant was in his possession at the Enodes bank located in Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, and was present at the F Gagog classical meeting, thereby impairing its utility by leaving approximately one hour and four minutes of the response of the electronic tracking device for about 09:46 on the same day until he returns home;

2. On May 26, 2013, around 23:50, around 2013: (a) left the e-mail tracking device that the Defendant was in possession of the Defendant in the Ha Park, Nam-gu, Hacheon-gu, Hacheon-gu, Hacheon-gu, and then left the e-mail tracking device for the location tracking device that was received by the J on probation and returned it to the Defendant, thereby impairing its utility by leaving about 27 minutes of the e

3. On June 7, 2013, around 17:26, the employees dispatched to a probation office who left the location tracking electronic device possessed by the Defendant at issue and leave the same place and the employees dispatched to the probation office make a request to the Defendant.