1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: Eul's evidence No. 4 is added to Eul's evidence No. 3, 5, and 8's evidence No. 9-1 and 2's evidence No. 10's evidence No. 3, 5, and 8's evidence No. 10's statement to the court of first instance between the 8th 9th to the 10th 10th 'B evidence No. 2'; and the plaintiff's statement to the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning for the judgment of first instance, except for adding the following judgment to the corresponding part as to the matters alleged by the court of first instance.

2. The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff is obliged to pay insurance proceeds for hospitalization under each insurance contract of this case, since he/she was hospitalized in this case for the direct purpose of treating major sexual diseases and major sexual diseases in the trial.

However, the evidence of the first instance court is insufficient to recognize the necessity of hospitalization even in consideration of the results of each fact-finding on the C Hospital and D convalescent hospital of this court, but it is not sufficient to recognize that each of the instant hospitalization in this case is a hospitalization for the direct purpose of the treatment of major personality diseases and major personality diseases. There is no

Rather, according to the result of the fact-finding on the D convalescent by this court, most of the pharmacologic treatment in the Dicvalescent was conducted by the method of administering the patient's pharmacologic according to the treatment with the neum of Incheon Sung Hospital. In fact, the relevant hospital prescribed the degree of reduction and medical control according to the patient's condition, and the examination can only recognize the fact that the patient did not conduct the examination other than the blood transfusion examination for blood control, and accordingly, it is difficult to recognize the necessity of each of the instant hospitalization and that the hospitalization was conducted for the direct purpose of medical treatment.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and all appeals against the Defendants by the Plaintiff are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.