logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.11.25 2019고단2126
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Text

In two months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes provided for in paragraph (1) of 2019 order4701 of the judgment of the defendant, each of the other crimes in the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On December 4, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Busan District Court on May 31, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Busan Correctional Institution on May 31, 2016. ② On August 25, 2017, the same court was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for the same crime, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 16, 2018, and ③ on March 23, 2018, the same court was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for the same crime and completed the execution of the sentence at the first prison of North Koreanbubane on October 4, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

Around 07:00 on May 13, 2019, the Defendant: (a) put approximately 0.03g of psychotropic drugs, a single-use psychotropic drug, in the dwelling area located in the building B in the Busan-gun, Busan-gun; (b) injected them with water; and (c) dilution them with water; and (d) injected them into the bloodline.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a Dpos tank motor vehicle.

On March 7, 2019, the Defendant operated the said car without obtaining a driver's license on March 21, 2019, and continued to proceed to the sub-terminal from the area from the discharge to the sub-section of the sub-terminal, which is located in the Busan Seo-gu Clock, Seo-gu, Busan.

Since there are crosswalks where signal lights are installed on the front side, the driver had a duty of care to safely drive according to the new subparagraph while checking whether there is a person to reduce speed and to check the front side and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded to the right side of the vehicle driving on the right side of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle by neglecting the fact that the vehicle driving signal is changed to a stop signal, and due to the negligence that is going to the yellow signal, the Defendant left side of the victim E (the age of 64) who dried the crosswalk according to the pedestrian signals.

The Defendant above.

arrow