1. The Defendant’s KRW 3,775,412 with respect to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from August 26, 2016 to January 11, 2018, and the next day.

1. The Plaintiff, based on the final judgment against Nonparty B, has a claim for reimbursement of KRW 434,561,316 as of July 7, 2016 against Nonparty B. Accordingly, based on the above final judgment, the Plaintiff received a claim for the seizure and collection order against the Defendant as to the wage and retirement allowance claim against the Defendant B. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim for collection amount of KRW 195,00,000, which is part of the Plaintiff’s claim amount

In addition, in collusion with B in order to evade compulsory execution, the Defendant is obligated to pay the above KRW 195,00,000 as compensation for damages, since the Defendant committed a tort of evading compulsory execution in collusion with B by lending benefits other than the benefits specified in the attached Form to B to B, thereby making the obligee not to recover the property of B by having B lend the Defendant’s account to B, and allowing B to deposit the real estate sales proceeds into the Defendant’s account, thereby making it impossible for the obligee to recover the property of B.

2. Determination

A. 1) The Plaintiff’s order of seizure and collection was issued against B by the Seoul Western District Court 2004 group 66523 group 204 group 204 group 2004 group 2004 group 203 group 2 (the order of the above final judgment is that B shall jointly and severally pay 434,170,097 won and damages for delay to the Plaintiff). The above final judgment is the executive title of the above final judgment, and it was served on March 12, 2010 by the Seoul Western District Court 2010 group 3302 group 2, Seoul Western District Court 2010 group 200 group 200 group 200 group 1/2 of the Plaintiff’s wage claim and retirement allowance claim against B against B or retirement allowance claim against B. The above decision was served on the Defendant, who is the garnishee around that time

B) The collection order and the collection order of the loan from the non-party 1 corporation and the collection money lawsuit are filed, and the loan from the non-party 1 corporation is deemed as the non-party 1 corporation.

On the basis of the executive title against Do B, it is against the defendant in April 2011.