logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.12.12 2017나317370
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From July 30, 2016 to October 30, 2016, the Defendant’s volatile Development, which was performing D emergency work in Chungcheongnam-gun, Ulsan-gun, the construction company, upon placing an order from the Gyeongbuk-do around July 2016 and intended to perform construction works, had four persons, including the Plaintiff, Defendant B, etc., who are engaged in the business of leasing construction machinery in the name of “E,” and Defendant B, etc., of the instant construction site, carried out the instant work in order to carry out joint works (hereinafter “instant work”).

B. In order to carry out the instant work on September 27, 2016, the four above four persons, at the construction site of the instant case, were loaded with the boarding equipment of Defendant B, F, and length (hereinafter referred to as “instant boarding equipment”) at the seat of Defendant B (hereinafter referred to as “instant boarding equipment”) with the boarding equipment of the size of nine meters in size. Defendant B boarded the instant drone on board the instant boarding equipment and buried it in the retaining wall, and drawing it into the retaining wall, and drawing it into the retaining wall, and drawing it into the retaining wall. The remainder one was the weight of the boarding equipment connected to the instant boarding equipment on the ground to be connected to the instant boarding equipment.

C. As above, while the Plaintiff and four persons, including Defendant B, carried out the instant work on September 27, 2016, the boarding equipment of the instant case was shocked to the front part of the driver’s seat, and the front part of the driver’s seat was displayed and the glass was damaged.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). [The grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap 1, 2, 10 evidence, Eul 1, 2 (including each number), Eul 1 and 2 (including each number), part of the testimony of the witness F of the first instance trial, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Determination as to the claim for damages

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1 that Defendant B provided the instant boarding equipment within the radius of the winter line.

arrow