1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the following order of payment shall be revoked.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this case are as stated in the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance (including attached Form 3-1 to 3-7), except for the following modifications, and therefore, it shall accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Revision] Part] Article 15 of the Decision of the court of first instance is the former head of the Gu (the end of the term of office on June 30, 2018) and Article 15 of the Decision of the court of first instance.

Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance court, the phrase " December 29, 2014" in Part 16 of the judgment of the third instance is deemed to read " January 8, 2015".

On the 6th sentence of the first instance court's ruling, the "compensation and compensation for consolation money due to defamation pursuant to Article 764 of the Civil Act" in the 5-6th sentence of the 5-6th sentence is "compensation and compensation for consolation money due to defamation pursuant to Articles 751 and 764 of the Civil Act".

The following contents shall be added to the 7th judgment of the first instance court, which is not “not” in the 11th judgment.

[Local governments cannot be the subject of external reputation protected by the means of punishment in relation to the public, and cannot be the victim of defamation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2014Do15299, Dec. 27, 2016). Moreover, it is difficult to view that it is the same in the area of civil law that discusses liability for damages arising from defamation based on a comprehensive personal right.

[] The part of the first instance judgment Nos. 15-19 of the 7th instance court ruling stating that “the Defendant is recognized to have lowered either through the instant advertisement” is as follows.

“The facts indicated in Table 2 of the Plaintiffs’ assertion through the instant advertisement (hereinafter referred to as “instant timely statement”).

The part of the judgment of the first instance court from 8th to 9th 7th 17th 17th 17th 3th 200 of the plaintiffs' social evaluation is recognized to have undermined the plaintiffs' social evaluation."

[3] This.]