It cannot be readily concluded that there was a risk for the loss of hydrogens possessed by the police force to be explosiond by the person who has lost them.

It cannot be readily concluded that there was a risk for the loss of hydrogens possessed by the police force to be explosiond by the person who has lost them.

Article 2 of the State Compensation Act, Article 763 of the Civil Act, Article 393(2) of the Civil Act

Plaintiff

Korea

Cheongju District Court Decision 69Na66 delivered on December 10, 1969

The part of the original judgment against the defendant shall be reversed, and the case shall be remanded to the Cheongju District Court Panel Division.

The ground of appeal No. 1 by the defendant litigation performer is examined.

According to the judgment of the court below, the non-party 1, who was the non-party 2's defense on the ground of the explosion of the accident, lost the number of the non-party 1, which was carried by the non-party 2, and the non-party 1, who was the non-party 2's non-party 1's defense, and the non-party 2's non-party 1's non-party 1's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 2's non-party 2's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 3's non-party 1's non-party 2's defense.

Therefore, it is so decided as per Disposition by Articles 406 and 400 of the Civil Procedure Act in accordance with the consistent opinion of all participating judges, omitting judgment on other arguments in the grounds of appeal.

Justices of the Supreme Court (Presiding Judge) Ma-dong (Presiding Judge) and Ma-dong B-Jed Han-gu