A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On January 19, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon Flag Flag, and on May 26, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving in Drinking) on the part of Flag Flag Flag, which was issued on May 26, 2008. On June 12, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving in Drinking in Drinking Flag).

[Criminal facts] The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the BP motor vehicle.

1. On April 16, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents: (a) driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol of 0.236% among blood transfusions; and (b) driven the road in front of the three-distance Yacheon-si Yacheon-si Yacheon-si Yaon-si Yacheon-si Yacheon-si Yaon.

At all times, there are nights and rains at the time of the road as a one-lane, so the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to operate safely by accurately operating the steering direction and the brake system in good faith.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, is driving without properly looking at the front part of the center line, and the part adjacent to the driver's seat of the victim C (W, 59 years old) driving of the DK5 si in the direction of the central line, was moved to the front part of the Defendant's Scro, and due to its shock, the said K5 si turns out to the opposite line, and led the victim E (W, 49 years old) driving in the direction of the said Scro in the same direction as the Defendant, which was going to the lower part of the victim E (W, 49 years old) driving in the direction of the said Scro vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the said C, such as brain-dead sugar, which requires approximately two weeks’ medical treatment due to occupational negligence, and injury to the said E, such as satise and tensions that require approximately two weeks’ medical treatment.

2...