logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.10 2016고단7006
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 22, 2016, the Defendant appealed two years and six months after having been sentenced to imprisonment by the Seoul Central District Court for a violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, and continues the appellate trial.

On August 25, 2016, the Defendant testified in the Seoul Central District Court Decision 506, which is located in Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court, on August 25, 2016, as witness of the crime of violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Good Offices, etc.) by the above court against D (2016Da413) and notified the right to refuse to take an oath and gave testimony upon receipt of the notification of the right to refuse to take an oath. The Defendant testified in the question, “I would like to urge the witness to receive money from E and take her name in return for money,” and “I would like to give testimony,” “I would like to give E only the condition to E at first, and eventually, I would like to give testimony to “I would like to see whether you would be able to grant the above loan.”

However, in fact, the Defendant, from September 2015 to September 2015, 2015, she was leased by the Defendant for approximately KRW 405,00,00 from the first patrol officer, and around KRW 1,50,00,00,00 to KRW 1,50,00,00,00 for a mobile phone francing and living together with the Defendant, women-friendly G, D, and D’s female-friendly group E, while having the Defendant engage in sexual traffic to receive KRW 1,50,00,00,00,00,000 from September 1, 2015, and received all of the said money by having E engage in sexual traffic over several times through mobile phone francing.

Nevertheless, the Defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A copy of each protocol of examination of suspect regarding D by the prosecution;

1. Each police officer for E.

arrow