1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff served as the chief in C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”).

The defendant is a press company that issues a “B” daily newspaper.

A reporter D, who belongs to the defendant, prepared an article of the title "E" (hereinafter referred to as "the article of this case") "F" on April 21, 2016, and posted it on B and the defendant's website, and the contents thereof are as shown in attached Table 2.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 and 2 evidence, Eul 3 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. 원고의 주장 요지 피고는 이 사건 기사를 통하여 “C 본사의 부장인 원고가 G에 근무하고 있던 H에게 ‘휴대폰 기기변경을 요청하는 한 고객에 대한 대응이 마음에 들지 않는다.’면서 폭언, 욕설 등 소위 갑질을 하였고, 이로 인하여 H이 사직하였다. H의 남편이 원고에게 사과를 요청하였으나, 원고는 ‘자신이 C 본사의 부장이라고 강조했는데도 뻣뻣하게 대해서 그랬다.’는 답변을 하였다.”는 허위사실을 적시하였다.

Therefore, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to publish a correction report in attached Form 1, and seek enforcement money if the Plaintiff did not implement the correction report, and seek payment of damages amounting to five million won due to defamation.

3. Determination

A. 1) Determination on a request for a corrective statement is based on the burden of proving that a press report is not true (see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 2009Da52649, Sept. 2, 201). The authenticity of a press report on a factual assertion is recognized as having been consistent with objective facts in light of the overall purport of the content thereof, and even if there is a little difference from the truth or somewhat exaggerated expression in the detail, a specific part in the process of making it easier to easily understand complicated factual relations.