1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is the same as that of the judgment of the first instance except for the submission or addition of the judgment of the first instance as follows. Therefore, this Court’s explanation is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary part] The 3th 16th 16th 3th 17th 17th 17th 17th 17th 17th 202 2th 3th 3rd 16th 16th 3th 16th 3th 2th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th

A. The 5th 5th 5th and the 6th 4th son shall each be the witness of the first instance trial.

P. The 6th 17th 17th " alone is recognized as the same," and the 6th 17th 17th 2th 2th 2th 3th 3th 3th 199

A. [Supplementary Provisions] If the agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on waste cables is not acknowledged, the Defendant asserts to the effect that the Plaintiff should return the above unjust enrichment to the Plaintiff, on the ground that the Plaintiff was unable to receive, or the amount equivalent to the waste cables currently kept by the Defendant was unfairly gain, and thereby the Plaintiff was damaged.

As seen earlier, the Defendant entered into an agreement with C on waste cables and no legal relationship between the Plaintiff cannot be deemed to have been formed. As such, the Plaintiff’s assertion that there is no legal ground for the delivery or storage of waste cables to the Defendant is without merit.

2. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.