logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.01.17 2018고단6490
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person of "2018 Highest 6787" shall establish a massage treatment establishment without qualification as a massage club.

The Defendant did not report the establishment of a massage treatment establishment to the competent authority, and, from June 2018 to October 1, 2018, established a massage treatment establishment at the fourth floor of the Massung B building without obtaining the recognition of a Masium, and without obtaining the recognition of a Masium, at the place of Masium, established a massage treatment establishment by receiving the amount of 11 to 220,000 won from customers who found the above place of business from customers as the price for massage treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against D, E, or F;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 87 (1) 2, Article 82 (3), and Article 33 (2) of the Medical Service Act concerning a crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The non-guilty part of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

1. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the summary of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) was committed by the Defendant, from January 12, 2018 to June 1, 2018, in the “C” business place operated by the Defendant from around 2018 to around 1, 2018, in which the Defendant received approximately KRW 100,000 ( KRW 90,000 to KRW 140,00 for each course) from an unspecified number of male customers, thereby allowing the said male to act similar to those of female employees, thereby mediating sexual traffic.

2. There are H’s written statements, H submitted audio-recording files, and advertising log photographs, which correspond to the facts charged, that the defendant arranged similar acts to customers while operating the said marina shop business.

However, in light of the following circumstances, it is insufficient to recognize that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, including the above evidence, has mediated the act of similarity as a business like the facts charged.

H At the instant date, the phone calls to the relevant marina business establishment at the same time, and is accompanied by a marina business.

arrow