Defendant

All A and prosecutor appeals are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by Defendant A (one year and six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence that the lower court sentenced the Defendants (one year and six months of imprisonment, one year and one year of imprisonment, one year of suspended execution, two years of suspended execution) is deemed to be too uneasible and unfair.

2. As to the assertion of unfair sentencing by Defendant A and the prosecutor, Defendant A and the prosecutor repeatedly committed each of the larceny of this case in a short period of time. In particular, Defendant A and the prosecutor committed the larceny of this case on five occasions in a short period of time, etc.; however, Defendant A and the prosecutor’s above assertion that some of the damaged items were temporarily returned to the victims; the Defendants are aware of each of the crimes of this case; Defendant B took part in the crime of this case to the extent that they view the network, and the degree of their participation is low; Defendant B took part in the crime of this case; Defendant B’s primary crime; Defendant B’s age, character, environment, criminal power, circumstances after the crime, etc. do not seem to be excessively heavy or unreasonable. Thus, each of the above arguments by Defendant A and the prosecutor are without merit.

3. According to the conclusion, the appeal by the defendant A and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.