logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2018.11.20 2018고단16
사기등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for three years;

2. Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

except that this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] Defendant

2. B On June 23, 2017, the Daegu District Court rendered a sentence of suspension of execution three years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the Daegu District Court’s support on one year and six months, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 2, 2017.

Defendant

3. On December 11, 2015, C was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on December 19, 2015, for a crime of fraud, etc. in the support of the Daegu District Court, the said judgment was finalized on December 19, 2015.

Ⅰ. From February 2014 to March 2015, Defendant A, B, and C operated a loan brokerage company in Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I building, J’s loan brokerage company in Seoul, and from March 2015 to April 2015, the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu L building Mho and N’s loan brokerage company in Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul (O) from March 2015 to April 2015.

Defendant

D from January 29, 2015 to April 2015, 2015, each of the loan brokerage companies was responsible for soliciting the other party.

Defendant

E and F are those who worked as employees of each of the above lending brokerage companies from January 2015 to April 2015.

1. Defendant (1-6), A, C, D, E, and F’s joint crimes, around December 2013, Defendant A informed Defendant B and C of “after opening a false workplace number, the other party to a loan without a certain workplace or fixed income to the loan and receive the loan brokerage commission from the lending party,” and caused Defendant B and C to enter a partnership with the said method, by soliciting Defendant B and C to operate a partnership.

Accordingly, Defendant A and D recruited the lending partner who prevented the lending fraud, and Defendant C, B, E, and F, using the false workplace telephone number as if the lending partner had a certain workplace or income by deceiving the lending partner as if the lending partner had a certain place of work or income, and had the lending counterpart received the lending brokerage fee from the lending partner.

A. Fraud Defendant A, B, C, and D are P.

arrow