A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 29, 2012, at around 19:40, the Defendant: (a) confirmed that the Defendant was able to turn on the house in the Cheongbuk-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the residence of the victim B, who was the former spouse (congested by agreement around August 201, 201), and opened the entrance, but opened the entrance; (b) caused the victim and his family members to escape part of themselves, such as the Plaintiff’s telephone not being received; and (c) caused the damage to the Defendant by cutting off the stones that were in the vicinity of the Plaintiff’s residence, which were 4 times in total, with the 150,00 won or more at the market price owned by the victim, such as the shouldering of the said Do loan A 202, which was put on the bend glass of the size of the tobacco lock.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Investigation report (the first site situation, etc.);

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. To suspend the execution of an order to attend a lecture for the treatment of domestic violence, etc. in consideration of the fact that the method of committing the crime of this case is very dangerous, such as leaving a room where the defendant is a person for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Probation, etc. Act, and that human life damage has not been inflicted even if the method of crime of this case is committed,

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.