The defendant shall be innocent.

1. At around 16:00 on November 16, 2012, the Defendant provided a degree of study to the victim E in the process of treating the victim E, who was suffering from the upper son’s fourth son’s upper son’s upper son’s upper son’s upper son’s son’s upper son’s son’s upper son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s

In such a case, the Defendant neglected to take measures for the head of a higher level course, which leads to the smooth flow of blood, and neglected to take measures for the head of a higher level course, and led the victim to an excessive degree course that pressures the head of the child, with a good space between the head of the school and the head of the school.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecution, on May 11, 2012, in order to treat the frame of the body of the victim's right 4 spared spared spared spared spared spared spared spared and spared spared spared spared spared spared spared in U-type on the victim's right 4 spared spared spared spared spared spared spared spared spared on May 14, 2012, and after the victim's water collection, etc. occurred on the victim's right spard spared spared spared spared spared spared spared spared spared spared spared spared (hereinafter "the injury of this case").

B. However, in full view of the following circumstances, the evidence submitted by the prosecution alone is insufficient to prove that there is an occupational negligence which pressures the defendant on the part of the evidence submitted by the prosecution, and that there exists a causal relationship between the occupational negligence and the instant injury.

(1) The victim removed Finine on June 11, 2012 and from May 15, 2012

6. Until December 13, 198, the Defendant hospital received the disinfection of the operation department and the upper part of the hospital in several times. The medical records stipulate that the medical records are "Wodoun".

(2) On August 2012, 2012, the victim shall take time after the date.