logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.09.23 2014가단534134
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 27,965,012, Plaintiff B, C, and D respectively, and each of them from August 8, 2014.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. (i) On August 7, 2014, E driving a F Freight Vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “AF Freight Vehicle”) around 07:14, and driving a substitute box in the substitute of the Osan City at the time of Osan City (hereinafter referred to as “AF”) and driving a three-lane road in front of the substitute box in the substitute of the Osan City at the end of the Osan City market at the speed of 60km each hour from the ebbbbb, the intersection would pass.

The driver who is engaged in driving on the intersection where the traffic is frequent but the signal is not installed, has a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely driving the front, rear and left well and safely.

Article 22(1) of the former Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Protection, Protection, and Protection, etc. of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (hereinafter referred to as “victim’s bicycle”) of the former Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Protection, etc. of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (hereinafter referred to as “victim’s bicycle”) of the former Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Protection, etc. of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (hereinafter referred to as “the former Enforcement Decree”).

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). G, after the instant accident, received medical treatment from the H Hospital due to cerebral cerebrovascular, etc., but died on the same day.

(v) The plaintiff A is the spouse of G, and the plaintiff B, C, and D are children of G, and the defendant is a mutual aid project operator who has entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to a household vehicle.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1-5 (including branch numbers, if any) and the purpose of the whole pleadings]

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is responsible for compensating the plaintiff for the damages caused by the accident of this case as the driver of a household driving car.

C. However, in full view of the facts acknowledged earlier, the fact that G operated a damaged bicycle without safety equipment and caused the instant accident to the left without any separate signal, etc. can be recognized as having occurred. Such circumstance is the occurrence of damage caused by the instant accident and its occurrence.

arrow