logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.07.09 2019가합568995
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant,

A. The phrase “request amount” in the attached Table No. 1 shall apply to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties, respectively.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

2. Articles 208(3)2, 150(3), and 150(1) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of the Acts (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 208(3)2, and 150(1) (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 89Meu4045, Jul. 25, 1989) only submitted a formal reply stating that the Defendant was served with a duplicate of the complaint of this case and sought to dismiss the complaint of this case and then appointed an attorney after the dismissal of the plaintiff and the appointed party, and did not appear on the date for pleading, and thus, the plaintiff (appointed party) and the appointed party did not appear on the date for pleading.

arrow