1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, and the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the entry, since the court’s explanation of this case is based on the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[1] According to Gap evidence Nos. 3 and 4, Eul evidence Nos. 2, and Eul evidence Nos. 3 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings, the defendant's wife F and D exchanged each other by facsimile with each other on February 13, 2012. However, as seen earlier, the defendant's power of delegation and purpose of use to delegate all the authority concerning the lease and management of the real estate of this case to D, as seen earlier, was issued with the certificate of personal seal impression (date of issuance: February 14, 2012) stating that the defendant delegated D with all the authority concerning the lease and management of the real estate of this case to D, was actually prepared and delivered on February 14, 2012, which was after the conclusion of the lease contract of this case. The above facts alone are difficult to deem that D obtained the power of representation from the defendant at the time of conclusion of the lease contract of this case, and no other evidence exists to prove that D obtained the power of representation at the time of execution of the above lease contract.

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.